Pages

Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta Jensema. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta Jensema. Mostrar todas las entradas

martes, 13 de octubre de 2009

Closed-captioned television: A new tool for reading instruction (1985)

Koskinen, P., Wilson, R., Jensema, C. (1985). Closed-captioned television: A new tool for reading instruction. Reading World, 24, 1-7.


ABSTRACT

A brief narrative description of the journal article, document, or resource. Describes two programs that involved teachers using closed-captioned television materials to develop skills in the areas of reading comprehension, vocabulary, and oral reading fluency with hearing, remedial readers.

Captioned television and the vocabulary acquisition of adult second language correctional facility residents (1996)

Koskinen, P, Knable, J., Markham, P., Jensema, C., & Kane, K. (1996). Captioned television and the vocabulary acquisition of adult second language correctional facility residents. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 24, 359-373.


ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of captioned television on the incidental vocabulary acquisition of seventy-two inmates of a Pennsylvania correctional facility. Participants viewed nine science information segments over a period of nine weeks. They were randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group of inmates was exposed to the science video segments with captions and the other group viewed the same science video material without captions. No definitions or explanations of the target science words were given during the brief science orientation sessions that took place on a weekly basis. Three posttests were administered to assess the participants' acquisition of the targeted vocabulary words. The tests consisted of word recognition, sentence anomaly, and word meaning measures. A brief television viewing questionnaire was also developed to assess the participants' perception of knowledge gained via the science videos and their opinion of the use of captions with such material. The results revealed no significant differences between the two groups on the word recognition and ...